Monday, July 31, 2017

Explain the significance of the barn in the novel as a whole.

In Animal Farm, the barn acts as an important symbol for two reasons.


First of all, the barn represents the animals' vision of utopia. It is the scene of Major's speech in Chapter One, for example, in which he talks of the inhumanity of man and the need for revolution. It is also the place in which he teaches the animals the song "The Beasts of England." Similarly, it is also the scene of...

In Animal Farm, the barn acts as an important symbol for two reasons.


First of all, the barn represents the animals' vision of utopia. It is the scene of Major's speech in Chapter One, for example, in which he talks of the inhumanity of man and the need for revolution. It is also the place in which he teaches the animals the song "The Beasts of England." Similarly, it is also the scene of Mr Jones' cruelty, when he fires shots at the barn to silence the animals during this meeting.


The Seven Commandments are also inscribed on the end wall of the barn. Again, these commandments represent the utopian ideals of the animals. They envisage a society in which animals are not dominated by man and thus emphasise equality and liberty.


Secondly, the barn is symbolic of the loyalty and dedication of the working animals on Animal Farm. As the leadership of the pigs intensifies, for example, they move further away the barn and it is left to those who perform the majority of the work. This occurs in Chapter Six and is justified by Squealer as being necessary for all the "brainwork" they have to do during the day. Over time, the pigs completely remove themselves from the barn, a move that is symbolic of their social distinction, and which spells disaster for the other animals.

How are Jem and Scout affected by their father's defense of Tom Robinson in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Jem and Scout have to put up with both children and adults telling them how horrible their father is for defending Tom Robinson. Scout gets in fights. She yells at Cecil Jacobs, then draws blood defending her father to cousin Francis at Christmas. The pressure from the community is so bad that even an elderly neighbor named Mrs. Dubose says horrible things to the kids about their father. As a result, Jem goes berserk. Scout explains how it has affected Jem to the point of chopping off the tops of Mrs. Dubose's camellia bushes:


"Jem had probably stood as much guff about Atticus lawing for ni**ers as had I, and I took it for granted that he kept his temper—he had a naturally tranquil disposition and a slow fuse. At the time, however, I thought the only explanation for what he did was that for a few minutes he simply went mad" (102).



The above passage is a kind of prologue to the story of Jem's camellia-chopping day. He grabs Scout's new baton that he has just bought her and takes out all his frustration and anger on the bushes. He has to face Mrs. Dubose afterwards, as Atticus orders, but he took out her bushes anyway, which shows just how much stress he is under during this time. Atticus shows that he understands that the kids have been and will be under pressure because of him defending Tom Robinson as follows:



"Scout. . . when summer comes you'll have to keep your head about far worse things. . . It's not fair for you and Jem, I know that, but sometimes we have to make the best of things, and the way we conduct ourselves when the chips are down—well, all I can say is, when you and Jem are grown, maybe you'll look back on this with some compassion and some feeling that I didn't let you down" (104).



Atticus tries to prepare them for more to come the following summer, and the kids seem to keep themselves together in the meantime. On the day of the trial, though, Scout overhears that Atticus was appointed to defend Tom and she believes that would have changed her whole year had she known:



"This was news, news that put a different light on things: Atticus had to, whether he wanted to or not. I thought it odd that he hadn't said anything to us about it—we could have used it many times in defending him and ourselves. . . But did that explain the town's attitude? The court appointed Atticus to defend him. Atticus aimed to defend him. That's what they didn't like about it. It was confusing" (163).



Scout becomes confused by the whole ordeal. It's difficult because she doesn't understand why she and her family have to be persecuted for standing up for what is right. Jem, on the other hand, really takes it hard afterwards. He really gets involved in the trial and believes that his father will win the case for Tom Robinson—that is, until the conviction is passed by the jury: then he cries. He's moody for weeks and doesn't even want to discuss it with Scout ever again. Fortunately, Jem and Scout come out of it all alright, and the pressure from the community settles down by the time they go back to school in the fall.

In The Great Gatsby, what does the "foul dust" that "floated in the wake of [Gatsby's] dreams" mean?

This line refers to the ending of The Great Gatsby and how deeply it affected Nick Carraway. In chapter 9 Nick explains why he moved away after the funeral by saying, "After Gatsby’s death the East was haunted for me like that, distorted beyond my eyes’ power of correction." At the end of the book Nick is no longer able to separate Long Island from his memories of the distasteful people living there. 

No one, except for Nick and Gatsby's father, came to the funeral. All the roaring, exciting parties that Gatsby had thrown, and not a single one of those people who had shown up and indulged in his overflowing hospitality had come to his funeral. Not even Gatsby's business associates and supposedly close friends made an appearance. Only one man showed up to the cemetery, and even he was appalled that no one else had come. 


The fact that no one seemed to care about Gatsby the second he died clearly upsets Nick immensely. Nick even mentions that living in his house, so close to Gatsby's abandoned mansion, disturbs him. 



"I spent my Saturday nights in New York because those gleaming, dazzling parties of his were with me so vividly that I could still hear the music and the laughter, faint and incessant, from his garden, and the cars going up and down his drive."



All these things contribute to the "foul dust," no doubt akin to an eternal bad taste in one's mouth, that Nick speaks of in the beginning of the book.


Perhaps the thing that drives him away from the East the most is the Buchanans. Daisy never once called or wrote, or gave any indication that she even knew Gatsby or cared in the slightest. One day in October some time after the funeral, Nick mentions meeting Tom and he acts extremely cold to him. Tom defends his behavior and denies any culpability for what happened to Gatsby.  After that meeting Nick's opinion of the Buchanans is cemented. 



"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy — they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made...."



At the end of the book, Nick is thoroughly disgusted with everyone around him and the magic of East and West Egg had died along with Gatsby. Those lines at the beginning of the book are about Nick's distaste for everything that contributed to or failed to care about Gatsby's death. 

What importance does the understanding of tolerance play for a relativist?

Relativism- be it cultural, moral, or otherwise- holds that there are no absolute truths and statements and behaviors must be evaluated in their own right. For example, there is a thought problem many philosophers turn to when discussing relativism: Was Adolf Hitler an evil man? Most people would say yes, Adolf Hitler ordered many heinous acts to be committed, and was a hateful man. But what if he truly believed that the killing of Jewish,...

Relativism- be it cultural, moral, or otherwise- holds that there are no absolute truths and statements and behaviors must be evaluated in their own right. For example, there is a thought problem many philosophers turn to when discussing relativism: Was Adolf Hitler an evil man? Most people would say yes, Adolf Hitler ordered many heinous acts to be committed, and was a hateful man. But what if he truly believed that the killing of Jewish, Romani, and gay/lesbian people was the right thing to do? A moral relativist would have to say that because Hitler believed it was the right thing to do, we have to respect his decisions. 


Relativism is tricky when it comes to tolerance because it removes the ability to make value judgments and consider the real moral or ethical quality of a statement, belief, or action. A relativist must be tolerant of even the most outrageous practices if the person committing such acts believes themselves to be acting on what is right. 


While relativism demands tolerance, tolerance does not necessarily demand relativism. It is possible to tolerate many things we disagree with or disapprove of without giving them validity. For example, a Roman Catholic might disapprove of the idea of same-gender marriage, but be tolerant of it. A relativist Roman Catholic would essentially give up their right to an opinion on the matter, so there is no question of whether or not they would have to tolerate same-gender marriage. This brings up an entirely new philosophical dilemma- how far can we go in being tolerant before we become complicit in immoral action?

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Whose footprints is the speaker referring to in the poem?

In the seventh and eighth verses of this poem, the speaker mentions “footprints on the sands of time,”


…that perhaps another,Sailing o’er life’s solemn main,A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,Seeing, shall take heart again.


These footprints are the legacies we leave behind when we die—the things that we have achieved in life, lessons we have learned and records we have filled. By mentioning these footprints the speaker is rallying the audience to become...

In the seventh and eighth verses of this poem, the speaker mentions “footprints on the sands of time,”



…that perhaps another,
Sailing o’er life’s solemn main,
A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,
Seeing, shall take heart again.



These footprints are the legacies we leave behind when we die—the things that we have achieved in life, lessons we have learned and records we have filled. By mentioning these footprints the speaker is rallying the audience to become like “great men” of the past, those whose memories serve as inspirations to the living. These men also have left footprints—indications that we can make our own lives great, just as they did. And in becoming great ourselves, we also will become inspirations to some “forlorn and shipwrecked brother," a dejected member of a newer generation, who will follow the footprints we made, and will himself achieve success.


So, these footprints are metaphorical—they are the memories of great deeds and good men that get cemented in history, to serve as an inspiration for us all to seize life and experience it to its greatest extent, rather than let it pass us by. And, the speaker stresses, by allowing ourselves to be inspired by these past events, we ourselves are becoming inspirations for others.

How did the United States contain communism?

After World War II ended, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other in many places, often dealing with the spread of communism. The Soviet Union wanted to spread communism, and we wanted to keep it from spreading.


The United States developed a policy called containment to stop communism from spreading. The basis of this policy was that communism would fail, and we needed to just keep communism from spreading. One example of...

After World War II ended, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other in many places, often dealing with the spread of communism. The Soviet Union wanted to spread communism, and we wanted to keep it from spreading.


The United States developed a policy called containment to stop communism from spreading. The basis of this policy was that communism would fail, and we needed to just keep communism from spreading. One example of containment in action was the development of the European Recovery Plan, also called the Marshall Plan, where we offered economic aid to European countries trying to prevent communism from spreading to their country. We knew that countries with a strong economy were less likely to become communist. For example, the economic aid helped keep Greece and Turkey from becoming communist.


We also came to the aid of West Berlin. When the Soviet Union cut off all land routes to West Berlin in order to force the Americans, British, and French to abandon the city, we organized the Berlin Airlift. We flew supplies into West Berlin until the Soviet Union lifted the blockade.


When North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, we went to the United Nations for action. North Korea, unprovoked, invaded South Korea in June 1950 in order to unite Korea into one country that would be communist. The United Nations, led by the United States, helped South Korea fight North Korea. North Korea was not able to conquer South Korea and make it communist.


The United States also developed a military alliance to deal with the spread of communism. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO for short, was a military alliance including the United States and many of the noncommunist nations of Western Europe. This alliance formed in case there was a conflict with the Soviet Union.


There were several actions the United States took after World War II ended to stop communism from spreading.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Based on the first chapter on Long Walk To Freedom, what did you like about it?

One appealing aspect of the first chapter in Mandela's autobiography is the way he shows how the systemic condition of racism impacts father and son.


The first chapter shows the extent of racism in South Africa.  It delves into the life of Mandela's father, Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa.   Gadla is a proud man whose dignity collided with the reality carved out for Africans in an imperialistic society.  When he defies the magistrate's orders, he pays the...

One appealing aspect of the first chapter in Mandela's autobiography is the way he shows how the systemic condition of racism impacts father and son.


The first chapter shows the extent of racism in South Africa.  It delves into the life of Mandela's father, Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa.   Gadla is a proud man whose dignity collided with the reality carved out for Africans in an imperialistic society.  When he defies the magistrate's orders, he pays the price.  Mandela writes that his father loses "his fortune and his title. He was deprived of most of his herd and land, and the revenue that came with them." Mandela's father suffered for defying unfairness, and showed the impact of racism.  The price that Mandela's father paid for challenging white authority shows how the painful effects of racism was something passed down from father to son.  Mandela's father almost gives it to his son as a sad inheritance, showing how generations had to cope with the reality of discrimination and prejudice.


However, I liked how Mandela provided a unique contrast to this.  The chapter's opening lines details how Mandela's name means "troublemaker."  I liked how Mandela used this fact to open a chapter on the pain of discrimination and institutional unfairness.  Whereas Mandela's father was ruined by it, Mandela's name can be seen as one that will bring "trouble" to it. What caused damage to his father is going to be undone by his son.  I thought that this contrast between the meaning of Mandela's name and the system he will eventually challenge was a powerful element in the first chapter.

What was the role of the church in the Middle Ages?

During the Middle Ages, the church's main responsibility was the spiritual well-being of Christians and ensuring that people can reach heaven. This responsibility allowed them to acquire a great amount of power and wealth. All Christians at this time believed in heaven and hell, so the church would direct them as to how to get to heaven. Having this authority allowed the church to charge fees to peasants and kings alike that would guarantee safe...

During the Middle Ages, the church's main responsibility was the spiritual well-being of Christians and ensuring that people can reach heaven. This responsibility allowed them to acquire a great amount of power and wealth. All Christians at this time believed in heaven and hell, so the church would direct them as to how to get to heaven. Having this authority allowed the church to charge fees to peasants and kings alike that would guarantee safe passage to heaven. The church charged the believers to perform sacraments. Every Christian was required to pay a tithe, or ten percent of their salary, to the church. Because of the wealth generated by their operations, the church became the largest landowner in Europe and was not required to pay taxes.


The church used their wealth and power to become a dominant political force in Western Europe as well. Kings were expected to follow the pope's lead. If they failed to listen to the pope, they could be kicked out of the church. This meant that the king could not get to heaven. The church, through its monasteries, also provided housing, schooling, and medical care to the growing peasant population.

Friday, July 28, 2017

What things does the shepherd promise to give his beloved? What do these promises tell you about the shepherd and his love for the woman?

The shepherd is promising an impossibly perfect natural world to his beloved. He is desperate to have her, so he paints a utopian picture of the world she and he might share together. He supposes that he can win her affection with such an idyllic description of their potential future. 


Within these various locations in nature, the shepherd promises "pleasures," and this suggests sexual overtones. He is promising grand locales, but that sexual theme is...

The shepherd is promising an impossibly perfect natural world to his beloved. He is desperate to have her, so he paints a utopian picture of the world she and he might share together. He supposes that he can win her affection with such an idyllic description of their potential future. 


Within these various locations in nature, the shepherd promises "pleasures," and this suggests sexual overtones. He is promising grand locales, but that sexual theme is there as well, so he is also promising sexual pleasure. Note that he asks her to be his "Love" and not his wife. This supports the notion that his desires are sexual and romantic.


He doesn't just promise a bed of roses. He promises many beds. He is overdoing it again but he is desperate to have her. The "bed" is sexually suggestive and the roses symbolize love and romance. 


He even promises her dresses, silver plates, and an ivory table. His fellow shepherds (swains) will sing for her every morning. All of these promises are products of his imagination. He has conjured these images and promises in an attempt to seduce his beloved. The dramatic lengths he goes to in conjuring these elaborate scenes shows how much he wants to be with her.

In George Orwell's 1984, How does Julia explain the Party's sexual puritanism?

Julia understands the Party's sexual puritanism as springing from more than just a desire on the part of the government to crush any vestige of life of outside of Party control. That might be one element behind the drive towards puritanism, but Julia intuitively grasps that the Party also wants to keep people (Party members that is: the government doesn't much care what the proles do) in what she calls a state of "hysteria" that...

Julia understands the Party's sexual puritanism as springing from more than just a desire on the part of the government to crush any vestige of life of outside of Party control. That might be one element behind the drive towards puritanism, but Julia intuitively grasps that the Party also wants to keep people (Party members that is: the government doesn't much care what the proles do) in what she calls a state of "hysteria" that is produced by sexual deprivation. The government's goal is to capture the Party members' pent up sexual energy and channel it into a lust for war ("war-fever") and worship of the Party leader. Julia intuits that a sexually satisfied and happy population is less likely to be riveted the Party and its activities. Julia explains her theory as follows:



When you make love you’re using up energy; and afterwards you feel happy and don’t give a damn for anything. They can’t bear you to feel like that. They want you to be bursting with energy all the time. All this marching up and down and cheering and waving flags is simply sex gone sour. If you’re happy inside yourself, why should you get excited about Big Brother and the Three-Year Plans and the Two Minutes Hate and all the rest of their bloody rot?’


Explore and discuss how Capote presents imprisonment in the novel In Cold Blood.

Capote spends a great deal of time discussing the way in which Dick Hickock and Perry Smith live when imprisoned. They had been paroled from prison when they committed the Clutter murders, so imprisonment has failed to reform them. 


In "The Corner," Capote describes in intimate detail the way in which Dick and Perry live while on death row in Kansas State Penitentiary (they would spend five years there before being executed in 1965). While...

Capote spends a great deal of time discussing the way in which Dick Hickock and Perry Smith live when imprisoned. They had been paroled from prison when they committed the Clutter murders, so imprisonment has failed to reform them. 


In "The Corner," Capote describes in intimate detail the way in which Dick and Perry live while on death row in Kansas State Penitentiary (they would spend five years there before being executed in 1965). While on death row, as Dick says, there is "no rest for the wicked" (page 321). The convicts are subject to extremes of hot and cold: "winter cold saturated the stone-and-iron fixtures, and, in summer, when temperatures often hurtled over the hundred mark, the cells were often malodorous cauldrons" (page 321). The cells are identical and are furnished with a cot, basin, toilet, and overhead light that is never turned off, even at night. The cell windows have bars and are covered with a mesh "black as a widow's veil" (page 310). The prisoners are not forced to work but can spend their days sleeping and reading. 


Capote also describes some of the other inmates on death row with Perry and Dick, such as Lowell Lee Andrews, who shot his family and shows no remorse about his actions. In the end, Dick and Perry are hanged. On page 340, Alvin Dewey watches Smith's execution (though he closes his eyes for part of it). Capote writes that Dewey believes that capital punishment is a deterrent to crime. Perry and Dick's nonchalant attitude before they are hanged (Perry winks at Dewey on his way to being hanged) contradicts this idea, as they don't seem to care much about dying and prison hasn't reformed them in the slightest. Capote presents the futility of imprisonment, as it does not function as a deterrent and does not reform prisoners. 

Thursday, July 27, 2017

What are some characteristics of Isabel?

Isabel is sweet. She's a hard worker. She has an evil, female task master. She dreams of being free some day. She sounds a lot like Cinderella, doesn't she?


In addition to the above traits, Isabel is tough. Madam Lockton is flat out mean to her. And I'm not talking about just having a lot of chores to do (although Madam Lockton does give Isabel a big workload). No, I'm specifically thinking about the time...

Isabel is sweet. She's a hard worker. She has an evil, female task master. She dreams of being free some day. She sounds a lot like Cinderella, doesn't she?


In addition to the above traits, Isabel is tough. Madam Lockton is flat out mean to her. And I'm not talking about just having a lot of chores to do (although Madam Lockton does give Isabel a big workload). No, I'm specifically thinking about the time that Madam Lockton had Isabel branded. That's something that people do to animals. The incident doesn't break Isabel though. If anything, it strengthens her resolve.


That brings up two more characteristics. Isabel is brave and determined. Most of the story is about her trying to save herself and her sister Ruth. Isabel is willing to do just about anything in order to gain her freedom. That includes spying for Patriots, which would mean death if caught.


Isabel is also incredibly loyal to her sister Ruth. But Isabel's loyalty doesn't end with family. She absolutely feels the need to pay back any debts of gratitude with a similar act of kindness. An example of that would be when Isabel risks her own life to save Lady Seymour from her burning house, because earlier Lady Seymour displayed kindness to Isabel.

What are the differences and similarities between the movie and book versions of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men?

There are two feature length films of Steinbeck's novella Of Mice and Men. One was made in 1939 with Burgess Meredith and Lon Chaney Jr. It is an excellent adaptation but might not be as appealing to a modern audience as the 1992 version with Gary Sinise and John Malkovich. For that reason, I will focus on the 1992 version. 


The plot is basically the same and the most important scenes, the opening scene...

There are two feature length films of Steinbeck's novella Of Mice and Men. One was made in 1939 with Burgess Meredith and Lon Chaney Jr. It is an excellent adaptation but might not be as appealing to a modern audience as the 1992 version with Gary Sinise and John Malkovich. For that reason, I will focus on the 1992 version. 


The plot is basically the same and the most important scenes, the opening scene with George and Lennie camped by the Salinas River, the fight between Curley and Lennie, and the scene with Lennie and Curley's wife in the barn are virtually identical, even down to the dialogue. In fact, the dialogue is exact in many places including the dialect used by the characters.


There are, however, some differences and things that are left out. One major difference is that the story is told as a flashback as George rides on a train. Another big difference is in the portrayal of Curley's wife. There is a hint of attraction between George and Curley's wife which does not exist in the book. There is an added scene with George and Curley's wife alone in the barn. She also seems more vulnerable in an added scene where she cries about Curley breaking her record collection. A major scene which is left out is the beginning of chapter six when Lennie is talking to the imaginary rabbit and his dead Aunt Clara. Obviously, this scene may have proved difficult to film. The ending of that chapter when Curley, Carlson and Slim show up after George has shot Lennie is also gone. 


The actors seem as though they actually walked off the pages of Steinbeck's book. John Malkovich as Lennie and Ray Walston as Candy are particularly excellent and embody all of the characteristics of those men. The director did a great job of making Malkovich look as big as Lennie. There is an added scene, which fits perfectly, showing Lennie loading grain bags on a wagon. There are two such scenes of the men working in the fields which do not detract and are implicit in the text. The setting too is very realistic. Although the movie was not filmed in the Salinas Valley, it was filmed about 200 miles south in the Santa Ynez Valley of California, which, for all intents and purposes, is virtually the same. The bunkhouse too is a good replica down to the card table and "tin-shaded electric light."


Who alerts the firemen to the old woman's library at 11 North Elm Street? How does the woman react when the firemen arrive? What effect does this...

When the firemen arrive at 11 North Elm Street, they discover that the police have not arrested the homeowner prior to their arrival. Normally, the offender is handcuffed, with mouth duct-taped, and carted away before the firemen arrive to burn the books and house. This night is different because the old woman does not run away when they crash through her door. She does not even try to escape. In fact, she starts quoting something that Beatty later reveals as a man named Latimer speaking to a Nicholas Ridley as they were burned alive in 1555 for heresy.


"Play the man, Master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out" (36).



Beatty slaps her for saying this and asks where the books are. She tells them they should know by the alarm card they have. She sees the alarm card and complaint, which is signed "E.B." She surmises that the neighbor who reported her is named Mrs. Blake. Apparently, anyone can report someone for having books without providing a bit of evidence.


Once all of the books are piled into one spot in the house, they are about to light everything on fire when the woman won't leave. Not only will she not be moved, she strikes the match that burns herself along with her house. Montag is shocked and can't believe that anyone would burn themselves on purpose over books.


Montag's reaction grows exponentially after seeing the woman burn herself with her books. This is a pivotal moment in the story because this is the beginning of the end—the end of his fireman job and life as he knows it. Montag already had a stash of a few books at his house, so he had the book bug when he went to the old woman's home that night. He even stole one of her books before she killed herself. Once she dies, though, Montag is never the same. He questions his world, his job, and his marriage. He wonders what books have that would be worth dying for. He's got the itch and he must read. Bradbury describes this transitioning time for Montag as follows:



"So it was the hand that started it all. . . His hands had been infected, and soon it would be his arms. He could feel the poison working up his wrists and into his elbows and his shoulders, and then the jump-over from shoulder blade to shoulder blade like a spark leaping a gap. His hands were ravenous. And his eyes were beginning to feel hunger, as if they must look at something, anything, everything" (41).



The above passage shows that Montag seems to feel the "poison," or desire to discover books, as if it starts with the hand that stole the book and is now traveling through his whole body to a point of no return. This is exactly the case. After the old woman burns herself, Montag is deeply moved to find out why books are worth living and/or dying for. He's never the same after this event.

What was the importance of the naval race?

The naval race was a very important event. Its impact was far lasting. Countries began to build up their navies in the late 1800s and in the early 1900s.


Germany and Italy were interested in gaining colonies. They had become unified countries around 1870, and by that time, most of the land available for colonization was gone. In order to gain colonies, these countries most likely were going to have to fight for these lands....

The naval race was a very important event. Its impact was far lasting. Countries began to build up their navies in the late 1800s and in the early 1900s.


Germany and Italy were interested in gaining colonies. They had become unified countries around 1870, and by that time, most of the land available for colonization was gone. In order to gain colonies, these countries most likely were going to have to fight for these lands. Part of the recipe for military success was to have a strong navy. When Germany and Italy increased their military size, which included the navy, other countries did the same thing. This was one of the factors leading to the start of World War I. Countries usually increase the size of their army and their navy because they have plans for military action.


Building up the navy also allowed countries to protect their world trade. Alfred Mahan’s book, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History: 1660-1783, stated that countries that are world powers must be able to protect their trade. Countries need to have bases around the world where their ships can stop and refuel and resupply. This book helped to encourage countries to build up their naval forces. The United States did this with its navy, nicknamed The Great White Fleet, which sailed around the world in the early 1900s to show other countries our military power.


The naval race in the late 1800s and in the early 1900s was an important event for many reasons.

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Analyze to what extent new ideas of race and nation created tension within and between states during 1890-1914 and what new forms of nationalism...

From 1894 to 1914, a new form of nationalism led to imperialistic ambitions on the part of European powers. This new form of nationalism was inspired by Social Darwinism; Darwin's theory of evolution supported the idea that certain races were superior to that of others. In appropriating the doctrine of the survival of the fittest for their nefarious aims, European powers such as England, Italy, France, and Germany acted to subjugate whole populations.

In essence, these new ideas about race and nation created tension between European imperialists and civilizations in the cross-hairs of these imperialistic initiatives. While England fought South Africans in the Boer War for territorial control and for access to gold mining operations, other European powers entertained similar ideas. In France, the anthropologist Georges Vacher de Lapouge developed the idea of separating the races into subgroups. In 1899, he wrote The Aryan: His Social Role. Lapouge hypothesized that all subgroups could be categorized by skull shape. The long-headed or dolichocephalic Aryan races were superior to the round-headed or brachycephalic races.


Lepouge's Homo Europaeus corresponded to members of the Anglo-Saxon race, with the characteristic blond hair and blue eye features so prized among nationalists (Adolph Hitler also espoused similar beliefs in the superiority of the Aryan race). Lapouge went on to characterize the darker-skinned peoples like the Jews as Homo Contractus. The Homo Contractus was characterized as an under-developed and backward species of man, whose only conceivable purpose was to serve as slave labor for the superior Anglo-Saxon races.


Meanwhile, Joseph Arthur, Comte de Gobineau, a French aristocrat and writer, developed the theory of the Aryan race. He regarded the mixing of the races as miscegenation and a crime against humanity. Gobineau saw the white races as the true proponents of human progress; therefore any sort of inter-marriage between the races was anathema. He saw the white, black, and yellow races embroiled in a cosmic conflict for relevance and supremacy in world affairs. Both Gobineau and Lapouge believed that France was sullied by the presence of inferior races. The tension occasioned by these misguided beliefs cannot be underestimated. Gobineau's Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races was published in German in 1897; it was later to influence the German dictator, Adolph Hitler.


Adolph Hitler adopted the racial theories of Gobineau and Lepouge to realize his nationalistic and imperialistic goals; he believed that it was the German state's prerogative to annihilate the inferior races in Germany and in the world. He saw imperialism as a war for the survival of the fittest on the global stage. Germany's relevance had to be secured through a catastrophic human holocaust; the master race was to be saved at all costs. To meet his goals, he roused the nationalistic sentiments of the German people to a fevered pitch.


In 1907, Friedrich von Bernhardi, a German general, argued that 'War is a biological necessity of the first importance, a regulative element in the life of mankind which cannot be dispensed with, since without it an unhealthy development will follow, which excludes every advancement of the race, and therefore all real civilization...' His beliefs echoed those of Houston Stewart Chamberlain, an English-born German citizen, who published his Foundations of the Nineteenth Century in 1899, where he hypothesized that Germany needed to fight to annihilate the inferior races, as the continued viability of mankind hinged on the preservation of the European master race. These new ideas about race and nation created such tension on the global stage that they became responsible for the atrocities and millions of deaths incurred in World Wars One and Two.


Source: Religious Anarchism (New Perspectives).

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Who were the narrator's tormentors?

Edgar Allan Poe's short horror story "The Pit and the Pendulum" begins with the narrator being sentenced to death. In the first paragraph, we only know that the ones who pass sentence on him have "inquisitorial voices" and are "black-robed judges." Poe deliberately creates an aura of mystery regarding why the narrator is being tried, who is trying him, and what his offense is. In paragraph five, the narrator has come to his senses enough...

Edgar Allan Poe's short horror story "The Pit and the Pendulum" begins with the narrator being sentenced to death. In the first paragraph, we only know that the ones who pass sentence on him have "inquisitorial voices" and are "black-robed judges." Poe deliberately creates an aura of mystery regarding why the narrator is being tried, who is trying him, and what his offense is. In paragraph five, the narrator has come to his senses enough to begin reflecting upon his state. He mentions again the "inquisitorial proceedings" and then refers to the "autos-da-fe" and Toledo, a city in Spain. From this we can determine that the narrator is a prisoner of the Spanish Inquisition, but not until paragraph 12 is the word "Inquisition" actually used. When the narrator refers to his captors, he calls them "inquisitorial judges" or "inquisitorial agents."


The Spanish Inquisition was a judicial institution established by the Pope to prosecute heresy; it functioned from 1478 to 1834. Its chief function was to verify the faith of Jews and Muslims who converted to Catholicism, but it wielded great power and could have dealt with anyone who the Church deemed as an enemy. For example, the Archbishop of Toledo was arrested in 1559 by the Inquisition and accused of Lutheranism; he was imprisoned for 17 years. Perhaps this is why Poe set his story in Toledo. As mentioned in the story, the condemned were usually executed at an auto-da-fe, a public pageant attended by large crowds and often royalty, which often featured burning of heretics at the stake. The head of the Inquisition was the grand inquisitor; he had five assistants as well as consultors; these would be the "black-robed judges" described in the first paragraph. There is no record of the Spanish Inquisition employing the methods of torture Poe describes in this story. Although Poe has General Lasalle rescuing the prisoner, Lasalle was never in Toledo. However, the appearance of General Lasalle helps us date the story to 1808. 


Poe uses members of the Spanish Inquisition as the tormentors of his protagonist, but by downplaying religious themes and leaving the specific nature of the narrator's crimes unnamed, he is able to focus more on the psychological and physical responses of his main character and less on the identities and motivations of his captors. 

What are two references to disease or decay in Hamlet?

We learn that something's rotten in Denmark and we will all be food for worms.

Perhaps the most famous comment about decay is in reference to Hamlet’s ghost.  Marcellus and Horatio see the ghost of the dead King Hamlet and are not sure what to make of it.



MARCELLUS


Let's follow; 'tis not fit thus to obey him.


HORATIO


Have after. To what issue will this come?


MARCELLUS


Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. (Act 1, Scene 4)



Marcellus appears to be commenting on the ghost, and also on the state of things in general.  After all, the kingdom seems to be in trouble.  King Hamlet was killed, and his brother Claudius married Queen Gertrude to become king.  There definitely seems to be some moral decay in the kingdom.


Another reference to decay occurs when Hamlet kills Polonius.  As part of his crazy act, he makes a comment about the dead man being food for worms.  When asked where Polonius is, he makes a macabre joke.



HAMLET


At supper.


KING CLAUDIUS


At supper! where?


HAMLET


Not where he eats, but where he is eaten: a certain
convocation of politic worms are e'en at him. Your
worm is your only emperor for diet: we fat all
creatures else to fat us, and we fat ourselves for
maggots… (Act 4, Scene 3)



This is Hamlet's commentary on how we all end up decaying equally, and one’s status in life makes no difference in death.  It is designed to make Claudius think he is crazy, but it is also intended as a jab at his new stepfather.  Someday, Hamlet is saying, you too will be food for worms.


Hamlet has an interesting conversation with the clown when they are digging Ophelia's grave.  The clowns provide morbid comic relief as they make jokes about decaying bodies.



Why, sir, his hide is so tanned with his trade, that
he will keep out water a great while; and your water
is a sore decayer of your whoreson dead body.
Here's a skull now; this skull has lain in the earth
three and twenty years. (Act 5, Scene 1)



Hamlet sees the skull of his former jester, Yorick, and ponders the brevity of life.  Everyone dies, and everyone decays, and then everyone looks the same as bones.  Hamlet is considering his own impending demise, because he worries that he won’t make it out of his quest for vengeance alive.

How does the setting of The Giver affect the conflict?

The conflict of the story is when Jonas learns that his community is killing babies.


The internal and external conflict are dependent on the dystopian setting.


Jonas’s community is supposedly perfect.  They have put a lot of effort into ensuring that.  In order to maintain this perfection, the community employs what is known as Sameness. Sameness means that everything about the community is tightly controlled.


Anything that might upset someone or make things difficult to...

The conflict of the story is when Jonas learns that his community is killing babies.


The internal and external conflict are dependent on the dystopian setting.


Jonas’s community is supposedly perfect.  They have put a lot of effort into ensuring that.  In order to maintain this perfection, the community employs what is known as Sameness. Sameness means that everything about the community is tightly controlled.


Anything that might upset someone or make things difficult to do is prevented.  This includes population control, and even control of the environment.



"Climate Control. Snow made growing food difficult, limited the agricultural periods. And unpredictable weather made transportation almost impossible at times. It wasn't a practical thing, so it became obsolete when we went to Sameness.


"And hills, too," he added. "They made conveyance of goods unwieldy. Trucks; buses. Slowed them down. So--" (Ch. 11)



The idea is to make sure no one is ever uncomfortable.  This is why the community has rules of language that are so strict.  There are rules for everything in the community.  Breaking a rule three times, or breaking one serious rule, results in release.


Jonas does not know what release really means until the incident with the newborn twin.  Twins are not allowed in the community because they might make someone uncomfortable.  Identical twins are not allowed.



The Giver's face took on a solemn look. "I wish they wouldn't do that," he said quietly, almost to himself.


"Well, they can't have two identical people around! Think how confusing it would be!" Jonas chuckled. (Ch. 19)



It is at this point that the story reaches its climax, or turning point.  Jonas has been slowly learning just how wrong the community is to do away with concepts like love and family.  Now he understands that a travesty occurs regularly in the community.  Innocent babies are killed to keep people from feeling uncomfortable.


Jonas’s internal conflict is the struggle that he faces to reconcile the understanding of what his community does with the perfect world he thought he lived in.  The external conflict is Jonas versus his community, when he decides he has to do something about the horrors of his community.

How would you describe the successes and failures of the progressive era? What were some of the successes and failures?

In looking at the Progressive Era, there were many successes and a few failures. The successes centered on dealing with many of the problems that existed in our society.


One success of the Progressive Era was getting people more involved in politics. As a result of the 17th Amendment, the citizens began to elect the United States senators instead of the state legislatures doing this. With the 19th Amendment, women received the right to vote....

In looking at the Progressive Era, there were many successes and a few failures. The successes centered on dealing with many of the problems that existed in our society.


One success of the Progressive Era was getting people more involved in politics. As a result of the 17th Amendment, the citizens began to elect the United States senators instead of the state legislatures doing this. With the 19th Amendment, women received the right to vote. Citizens could introduce legislation in the state legislature as a result of the initiative. Citizens could remove elected offices from office before their term was up as a result of the recall. Citizens could vote on proposed ideas as a result of the referendum. The Progressive Era helped citizens become more involved in politics.


The Progressive helped workers. Working conditions in factories were poor. People worked long hours often in unsafe conditions. As a result of the Progressive Era, worker compensation laws were passed to help workers who were injured while working. Health and safety laws were passed to improve the dangerous conditions that existed in factories. Child labor laws were passed to reduce the number of kids working instead of going to school. Compulsory school attendance laws were also passed.


The Progressive Era was responsible for taking on big businesses. The presidents of the Progressive Era broke up many big businesses. These businesses used a variety of arrangements to reduce competition and increase prices. Laws were passed to regulate the actions of businesses. The Bureau of Corporations could investigate businesses. The Hepburn Act allowed the Interstate Commerce Commission to set railroad rates. The Meat Inspection Act allowed for the federal government to inspect meat that was processed in the meat factories. The Bureau of Mines allowed for monitoring of the mining companies. The Clayton Antitrust Act prevented price discrimination by businesses.


One area of failure was the lack of help provided to African-Americans who were facing discrimination. The Jim Crow Laws continued to exist. Lynching continued to occur. African-Americans were not able to see a significant improvement with the inequalities that they continued to face.


While unions were allowed to exist as a result of the Clayton Antitrust Act, it wasn’t until the National Labor Relations Act, called the Wagner Act, was passed during the New Deal that unions really began to benefit from laws that allowed unions to exist.


The Progressive Era had many more successes than failures. Much was accomplished to improve conditions in our country during the Progressive Era.

In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, what are some quotes that would explain why Dill and/or Tom Robinson are "mockingbirds"?

Mockingbirds are symbolic of innocent individuals throughout the novel. Similar to mockingbirds, innocent individuals do nothing to harm others; they bring joy to the people they encounter. At the beginning of the novel, Dill is an innocent child who has yet to be exposed to racial discrimination and injustice. He is Jem and Scout's good friend and is always entertaining them in the summertime. Dill's innocence and positive attitude make him a symbolic mockingbird. During the trial of Tom Robinson, Dill gets upset and begins to cry. After Scout walks him out of the courtroom, he tells her that Mr. Gilmer made him sick. He says,


"Well, Mr. Finch didn't act that way to Mayella and old man Ewell when he cross-examined them. The way that man called him 'boy' all the time an' sneered at him, an' looked around at the jury every time he answered---" (Lee 266)



Dill says that Mr. Gilmer had no business treating Tom Robinson with contempt, and he could care less if Tom was black. For Dill, witnessing racial discrimination is traumatic and this is the moment he loses his childhood innocence. His reaction portrays why his character is a symbolic mockingbird.


Similar to Dill, Tom Robinson is considered a mockingbird because he does nothing to harm anybody and brings joy to those around him. While Tom is on the witness stand, Atticus asks him if he was paid for his services to Mayella. Tom says,



"No suh, not after she offered me a nickel the first time. I was glad to do it, Mr. Ewell didn't seem to help her none, and neither did the chillun, and I knowed she didn't have no nickels to spare." (Lee 256)



Tom's helpful and considerate response portrays him as a symbolic mockingbird. Tom never hurt Mayella and was only trying to help her. Tragically, Tom falls victim to racial injustice and is wrongfully accused of raping Mayella Ewell.

In The Giver, what do you feel is the most important aspect of the Ceremony of Twelve? Also, in a Utopian society, what rules should the Community...

The Ceremony of Twelve is important because it is the one time in the community when differences are mentioned. 

Everything in Jonas’s community is about Sameness.  Everyone follows strict rules of behavior and has all of their choices made for them.  Individuality is discouraged.  The one time it is important is in determining what role citizens will play in the community.  For this, the community needs to take advantage of any individual traits that might have survived Sameness.


Everything in the community is designed to keep people from feeling uncomfortable.  Actually, the community is designed to prevent people from feeling at all.  This is what the dream telling and feeling telling rituals are about.  Any time someone has a feeling, the objective is to get rid of it right away.


The Ceremony of Twelve follows ten other ceremonies that promote conformity.  The only other one that doesn’t is the Ceremony of One.  Every child has a number from birth.  At the Ceremony of One they are also assigned a name.  It is one small part of individuality.


The Chief Elder explains why the Ceremony of Twelve is different.



Then the Chief Elder moved ahead in her speech. "This is the time," she began, looking directly at them, "when we acknowledge differences. You Elevens have spent all your years till now learning to fit in, to standardize your behavior, to curb any impulse that might set you apart from the group. (Ch. 7)



She notes that the ceremony honors their differences because they determine their futures.  The committee of elders carefully reviews these differences to assign jobs based on the traits that individuals possess.  It is the one time when it is okay to stand out from the group.


During the ceremony, the other community members do not really do more than sit and listen.  Everyone is expected to come to the ceremony, except the Receiver.  He comes on the day that Jonas is selected, to see Jonas’s part of the ceremony.  There are rituals that the citizens take part in during the ceremonies.  For example, the Ceremony of Loss and the Ceremony of Replacement happen then.  When a four year old dies, the family gets a replacement child during this ceremony.



Now, at this special Naming, the community performed the brief Murmur-of-Replacement Ceremony, repeating the name for the first time since the loss: softly and slowly at first, then faster and with greater volume, as the couple stood on the stage with the newchild sleeping in the mother's arms. (Ch. 6)



This takes place during the ceremony day.  The replacement child gets a name, and all of the other one year olds do too.


The Ceremony of Twelve is one of the main things that makes Jonas's community unique.  It is part of the dystopia, because it means that the community controls everyone's lives down to the last detail.  People can't choose their fates.  They are not even allowed to choose their professions.

Monday, July 24, 2017

How does effective communication incorporate the basic elements of communication?

Effective communication takes into account all the basic elements of communication and uses them well. 

  • Speaker: Aristotle considered the ethos of the speaker the most significant factor in making a speech persuasive. This includes both extrinsic ethos, in the sense of a speaker's reputation, and intrinsic ethos, or how the speaker portrays him or herself in a speech. For extrinsic ethos, having expertise reflected in advanced degrees or tangible achievements will make a speaker more credible. For intrinsic ethos, using language well (i.e. no grammatical errors, pronouncing words correctly) and being polite and respectful towards your audience contribute to persuasiveness.

  • Audience: Communicating effectively requires adapting your message to the nature of your audience. Just as you speak differently to your grandmother than you do to your friends, so the language you use at a frat party is probably not appropriate for a formal business environment.

  • Message: Your message should be clearly presented and logically consistent.You should use multiple forms of evidence and argument to support your message and you should stay on topic. 

  • Medium: You should choose the most appropriate medium for your audience and message. A short pithy comment might suit Twitter, but a complex discussion of a sensitive topic might be best held in person. 

What does Utilitarianism suggest about the distribution of wealth in society? Why do Libertarians object to Utilitarians on this point?

Neither Utilitarianism nor Libertarianism are monolithic, and thus different representatives of these traditions advocate somewhat different economic systems.


In Libertarianism, absolute freedom of the individual is paramount with limited regard for how that freedom impinges on other people. Grounded to a degree in Mill's "harm principle," most libertarians want to minimize government. With regard to distribution of wealth, Libertarians can fall into multiple camps, ranging from extreme "free market capitalists" such as Ayn Rand, who...

Neither Utilitarianism nor Libertarianism are monolithic, and thus different representatives of these traditions advocate somewhat different economic systems.


In Libertarianism, absolute freedom of the individual is paramount with limited regard for how that freedom impinges on other people. Grounded to a degree in Mill's "harm principle," most libertarians want to minimize government. With regard to distribution of wealth, Libertarians can fall into multiple camps, ranging from extreme "free market capitalists" such as Ayn Rand, who see wealth inequality as a natural effect of differential ability and drive, to libertarian socialists who wish to abolish private property completely. 


Utilitarianism, or its contemporary incarnation as Consequentialism, argues that the central tenet of ethics and political theory is the maximization of happiness, in the form of "the greatest good for the greatest number". This emphasis on the "greatest number" suggests that great concentrations of wealth in the hands of a few people is a problem, as it may increase the happiness of a few people at the expense of the relative unhappiness of many, leading to a far lower overall degree of happiness than a more equal system. Many free market capitalist Libertarians object to any form of income redistribution as interfering with individual liberty.

Ionization energy is the energy needed to eject an electron from an atom. Compute the ionization energy of a hydrogen atom in its fourth excited...

The ionization energy can be calculated by determining the difference between the energy of an electron in its initial state and the final state. This change in energy can be calculated by using the following equation:


Ionization energy = `E_oo - E_5`


` `


= `-R_H (1/n_f^2 - 1/n_i^2)`


where, `R_H` has a constant value of `2.179 xx 10^-18` J. Also, the energy at infinity will be zero. Substituting all the values, we get:


ionization energy =  ...

The ionization energy can be calculated by determining the difference between the energy of an electron in its initial state and the final state. This change in energy can be calculated by using the following equation:


Ionization energy = `E_oo - E_5`


` `


= `-R_H (1/n_f^2 - 1/n_i^2)`


where, `R_H` has a constant value of `2.179 xx 10^-18` J. Also, the energy at infinity will be zero. Substituting all the values, we get:


ionization energy =   2.179 x 10^-18 x (0 - 1/5^2) 


= - 2.179 x 10^-18 x (-1/25) = 8.716 x 10^-20 J


We can convert this to the units of kJ/mol by first multiplying energy change by Avogadro's number:


Ionization energy = 8.716 x 10^-20 J/atom x 6.023 x 10^23 atoms/mole


We then multiply that number by (1 J / 1,000 kJ) to get the final answer.


= 52.49 kJ/mol (the positive sign indicates that the energy is absorbed).


Hope this helps.


Sunday, July 23, 2017

What are some of the themes of Other Colors by Orhan Pamuk?

Because Orhan Pamuk’s Other Colors is a collection of essays and short stories, there are many themes contained within its pages, but there are two that are most prominent. The first is the conflict between Eastern and Western values. Part of this conflict is personal; Pamuk was born in Istanbul, but to an upper-class family with many Western ties, ideologies, and sympathies. This duality leads him to inner conflict: “As for my place in the world—in life, as in literature, my basic feeling was that I was ‘not in the centre’” (Pamuk, 2007, p. 8). He also speaks of how he often “quarreled with his life” (p. 9). Part of the conflict is cultural, and his father’s library becomes representative of that:


At one end, there were Istanbul’s books—our literature, our local world, in all its beloved detail—and at the other end were the books from this other, Western, world, to which our own bore no resemblance, to which our lack of resemblance gave us both pain and hope. To write, to read, was like leaving one world to find consolation in the other world’s otherness, the strange and the wondrous. (p. 8)



And part of the conflict is ideological and religious, to which he alludes when he writes:



We have often witnessed peoples, societies and nations outside the Western world—and I can identify with them easily—succumbing to fears that sometimes lead them to commit stupidities, all because of their fears of humiliation and their sensitivities. I also know that in the West—a world with which I can identify with the same ease—nations and peoples taking an excessive pride in their wealth, and in their having brought us the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and Modernism, have, from time to time, succumbed to a self-satisfaction that is almost as stupid. (pp. 11-12)



Pamuk describes himself as a ‘cultural Muslim,’ with ideas and appreciations that for him have no connection to God (Nobel Foundation, 2006). He has deep appreciations for Western culture and ideologies as well, and this conflict is a running theme in many of his works. Connected to that theme, but broadened significantly, is the theme of Turkey’s cultural identity, the struggles the country is having in reconciling its Islamic past and present with its desire to be a member of the European Union, an entity that denounces the ‘stupidities’ to which Pamuk alludes earlier.


A second theme that is prevalent in Other Colors, and indeed in many of Pamuk’s other works as well, is writing. It was not only reading that allowed him to escape his own culture, ‘it was by writing, too’ (Pamuk, 2007, p. 8). He also arrives at a point where he see Istanbul as his centre, and he writes because he wants the whole world to see his Istanbul the way he does, to appreciate and love their culture as he does (p. 14). Writing also affords him a sense of purpose and bestows meaning on his life: ‘Except for the hours I spend writing, life to me seems to be flawed, deficient, and senseless’ (Nobel Foundation, 2006). But more than that, writing was/is a way to self-discovery: ‘A writer is someone who spends years patiently trying to discover the second being inside him, and the world that makes him who he is. [. . .] To write is to turn this inward gaze into words’ (Pamuk, 2007, p. 3). In nearly every piece in this collection, Pamuk speaks to the power of writing and to the responsibility of writers to use that skill to explore themselves and to create revelation for the world.


There are many other themes in Pamuk’s Other Colors—self-reflection, cultural evolution, imitation, and others—but it is the themes of writing and the conflict of cultures that are most prevalent.

Be able to describe the relationship between fatty acids and triacylglycerol

Lipids are hydrophobic non-- polar large molecules that are built from smaller molecules attached by covalent bonds. Examples of lipids are  fats, oils and waxes. 


A fat is composed of glycerol and three fatty acids.Glycerol is a type of alcohol with three carbons in the molecule to which a hydroxyl group is attached to every carbon. A fatty acid contains a carboxyl group attached to a long carbon skeleton to which hydrogens are bonded....

Lipids are hydrophobic non-- polar large molecules that are built from smaller molecules attached by covalent bonds. Examples of lipids are  fats, oils and waxes. 


A fat is composed of glycerol and three fatty acids. Glycerol is a type of alcohol with three carbons in the molecule to which a hydroxyl group is attached to every carbon. A fatty acid contains a carboxyl group attached to a long carbon skeleton to which hydrogens are bonded. The skeleton is usually between 16-18 carbons in length. Because of the covalent bonds between carbon and hydrogen which are non polar, the skeleton is hydrophobic and the reason why fats and water do not mix--the polar water molecules hydrogen bond to eachother and don't bond to the fats.


fat molecule is formed by dehydration synthesis when three fatty acids are joined to a glycerol molecule which forms a triacylglycerol (triglyceride). The bonds where the fatty acid join to the glycerol molecule are known as ester linkages. Each of the three fatty acids may be of the same type, or different fatty acids.


Therefore the relationship between fatty acids and triacylglycerol is that a fatty acid is a component of fat and a fat molecule itself contains three fatty acids attached to a molecule of glycerol--hence the word  triacylglycerol which refers to three of those fatty acid molecules which are present in a fat. The functions of fat are--energy storage, to cushion the internal organs and for insulation.


I have included a link with a diagram showing how the macromolecule fat is formed by dehydration synthesis from its smaller components--glycerol and three fatty acids.

In Lowry's The Giver, why is Jonas surprised when he goes into the annex for the first time?

The community in Lois Lowry's The Giveris very secure because there is no crime to speak of. They don't have television shows or movies that show criminals breaking and entering; they don't have malice towards anyone else; and they don't witness the breaking of laws in any way. In addition, there is no reason to have locks on family dwellings, schools, or public buildings. This is definitely one of the benefits of living in...

The community in Lois Lowry's The Giver is very secure because there is no crime to speak of. They don't have television shows or movies that show criminals breaking and entering; they don't have malice towards anyone else; and they don't witness the breaking of laws in any way. In addition, there is no reason to have locks on family dwellings, schools, or public buildings. This is definitely one of the benefits of living in this colorless, loveless, choiceless community--it's safe. So when Jonas arrives at the annex, the dwelling for The Receiver, he first notices a doorbell. After pushing it, he hears the door unlatch and is greeted by a receptionist. When the receptionist notifies the Receiver, he hears another click and seems confused. The receptionist explains as follows:



"The locks are simply to insure The Receiver's privacy because he needs concentration. . . It would be difficult if citizens wandered in, looking for the Department of Bicycle Repair, or something" (73).



She goes on to inform Jonas that he is perfectly safe and not in danger. Thus, this is the first time that Jonas experiences locks on any doors and this is why he is surprised. The locks certainly introduce Jonas into a more secretive part of the community that has been kept from him as a child. Symbolically, the unlocking of these doors opens a new world of adulthood and difficult choices to Jonas, and he is never the same again. 

Saturday, July 22, 2017

What are Atticus Finch's morals and values compared to Bob Ewell's morals and values?

Atticus Finch is the morally upright character in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, and Bob Ewell is his foil. These two characters have contrasting morals and values. Atticus values education and moral development. He believes in equality, justice, and tolerance.Atticus courageously defends Tom Robinson in front of a prejudiced jury and displays integrity in multiple scenes throughout the novel. He keeps his "cool" in adverse situations and does not react with anger when...

Atticus Finch is the morally upright character in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, and Bob Ewell is his foil. These two characters have contrasting morals and values. Atticus values education and moral development. He believes in equality, justice, and tolerance. Atticus courageously defends Tom Robinson in front of a prejudiced jury and displays integrity in multiple scenes throughout the novel. He keeps his "cool" in adverse situations and does not react with anger when community members threaten and insult him for defending Tom. Atticus also believes in humility and hard work. Atticus values the truth and never lies to his children or the community members of Maycomb.


Bob Ewell is the novel's antagonist who attempts to kill Scout and Jem. Bob has no morals and is the most disgraceful character in the novel. He is willing to go to extreme lengths to get revenge, and it is even suggested that he sexually molests his own daughter. He values his reputation and reacts with anger after Atticus reveals he was responsible for beating his daughter. Bob's bruised ego is his motivation to "get even" with everyone who wronged him during the trial. Bob values traditional Southern ideas of white supremacy, which is why he assaults his daughter after witnessing her seduce a black man. Bob obviously does not value his children or education. He leaves Mayella to raise the children and does not care that Burris doesn't attend school.

Which passage from Act I of Julius Caesar includes a metaphor?

A metaphor is a comparison of two things to show the particular quality of one of those things. In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Act I, there are a few important metaphors.

In Scene 1, the tribunes Marullus and Flavius are upset at the working men who have come out to cheer the return of Caesar. The tribunes were followers of Pompey who was defeated by Caesar. In line 36, Marullus compares the crowd to inanimate objects:



You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things



And later in the scene, Flavius compares Caesar to a hawk who might fly too high and keep the people in fear and servitude. He says,



Who else would soar above the view of men


And keep us all in servile fearfulness.



In Scene 2, Cassius tries to convince Brutus that Caesar has grown too powerful and it is up to them to keep Rome a republic and not a dictatorship. He compares Caesar to a carnivore and the people of Rome his meat. Cassius says,



Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed,


That he is grown so great?



A little later in that scene, Caesar, sensing the possible tyranny of Cassius, compares him to a wolf or coyote. Caesar says,



Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;


He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.



In Scene 3, Casca uses an extended metaphor to say that Rome is on the verge of some terrible calamity. He comments on the severity of the weather and says he's seen a man with his hands on fire but the flesh not burning. He met a lion, but the beast ignored him and he saw an owl outside in the daytime. He believes these natural phenomena are an omen of something awful to come. He says,



"These are their reasons, they are natural," 


For I believe they are portentous things


Unto the climate that they point upon.



Later in Scene 3, Cassius again compares Caesar to a carnivore and the people of Rome his food. He says,



Poor man! I know he would not be a wolf


But that he sees the Romans are but sheep.


He were no lion were not Romans hinds.


Take a close look at how some poetic elements work in the poem, such as figurative language, sound and rhyme, rhythm and meter, symbols, diction...

“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” has earned its position in the canon of literature largely through T.S. Eliot’s sheer mastery of poetic language. Out of Eliot’s oeuvre, the poem is arguably the piece that is most representative of his piquant use of language, and showcases his considerable talent with sketching compelling images that reinforce the messages he conveys through the nebbish antihero Prufrock. The first lines set the pace for what follows:


“Let us go then, you and I,


When the evening is spread out against the sky


Like a patient etherised upon a table” (71).



The first two lines are romantic and evocative, and Eliot brilliantly uses the third line to undercut that idealized tone. Eliot sets up a heroic, active opening, using a familiar AA rhyme scheme, and then subverts readers’ expectations by using the grim image of a “patient etherised upon a table.” Additionally, this image reinforces Prufrock’s inability to act, to speak, to properly express his innermost thoughts and desires to the outside world. He is the patient stretched out on the table; he is passive and inactive, being acted upon instead.


Another excellent example of Eliot’s language servicing the deeper meaning of his poetry occurs midway through the poem, with the following famous lines:



“I should have been a pair of ragged claws


Scuttling across the floors of silent seas” (73).



Here, Eliot’s use of synecdoche—a part being used to represent a whole entity— perfectly encapsulates the character of Prufrock. Prufrock relates himself to a pair of claws as opposed to a whole creature. Indeed, he sees himself as incomplete, as subterranean and unseen compared to others. Moreover, Eliot’s careful diction is wholly on display in these brief lines. He uses words like “ragged” and “scuttling” to convey Prufrock’s low self-esteem and isolation from society, and emphasizes the alliterative “s” sounds in the second line in order to mimic a scuttling sound.


Overall, Eliot was a master of manipulating poetic language to service the deeper meaning of his poems. In “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” Eliot uses alliteration, synecdoche, and striking images of impotence in order to add further depth to the poem.


I pulled my textual evidence from The Bloodaxe Book of 20th Century Poetry.

Friday, July 21, 2017

What is Brian's most important discovery in Hatchet?

Without a doubt, Brian's most important discovery during his whole ordeal is his ability to make fire. Not only does his ability to start a fire save him from dying in the wilderness, it allows him to thrive.


While there are a number of benefits to having a fire near his shelter, including warding away mosquitoes and nighttime predators and staying warm and dry during poor weather, the greatest benefit from the fire is the...

Without a doubt, Brian's most important discovery during his whole ordeal is his ability to make fire. Not only does his ability to start a fire save him from dying in the wilderness, it allows him to thrive.


While there are a number of benefits to having a fire near his shelter, including warding away mosquitoes and nighttime predators and staying warm and dry during poor weather, the greatest benefit from the fire is the ability to cook food.


The human brain consumes an enormous amount of energy, and the only efficient way for humans to consume and process enough calories in one day is to cook our food before eating it. Brian would not have survived for very long if he had to forage for plant matter and eat it raw. Cooking plant matter and meat gives him the energy he needs to improve his living conditions and eventually escape.


I strongly recommend viewing the following video from PBS, which discusses the importance of cooking from an evolutionary and survival perspective: Why Do We Cook?.

Why can't we travel at the speed of light?

The speed of light is the theoretical limit to the speed of an object. In fact, no object can reach the speed of light. Think about the scenario using Newton's Second Law of Motion which states that force is a product of mass and acceleration. For an object to be able to move with velocities comparable to that of light, some force has to be imparted to it. It has been found that an extraordinarily...

The speed of light is the theoretical limit to the speed of an object. In fact, no object can reach the speed of light. Think about the scenario using Newton's Second Law of Motion which states that force is a product of mass and acceleration. For an object to be able to move with velocities comparable to that of light, some force has to be imparted to it. It has been found that an extraordinarily large amount of energy has to be spent to make something move with velocities comparable to that of light. 


The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland is one of the most sophisticated machines ever built by human beings and even it has not been able to push electrons beyond 99.9999991% of the speed of light.


Another way to think of the impossibility of motion at or beyond the speed of light is that particles becomes extremely heavy as they approach the speed of light and hence the amount of energy required for their continued acceleration becomes impossibly large.


Hope this helps. 

What was the concept of Women and Economics in 1898?

Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s book Women and Economicswas published in 1898. While others were concerned with women’s suffrage, Gilman investigated the role of women in a society that was becoming increasingly industrial. In part, her beliefs were based in social Darwinism. She wrote, “We are the only animal species in which the female depends on the male for food, the only animal species in which the sex-relation is also an economic relation.” In her book...

Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s book Women and Economics was published in 1898. While others were concerned with women’s suffrage, Gilman investigated the role of women in a society that was becoming increasingly industrial. In part, her beliefs were based in social Darwinism. She wrote, “We are the only animal species in which the female depends on the male for food, the only animal species in which the sex-relation is also an economic relation.” In her book she describes how the roles of both men and women grow and progress because of societal change over time.


 Gilman’s concept was based on the need for both a men and women to work outside the home in industrial society. When society was agrarian, women's roles as mothers and homemakers were a necessity. Women produced more children who were needed to make farm life successful. But as society trended toward industrialization, she stressed that woman should be encouraged to find roles in the working world to achieve financial independence.


She questioned women’s subservient position to men both in the home and in the workforce.  Although her ideas sounded radical at the time, her ideas on child care and professionalism in women have come to fruition in contemporary society. Her book planted the seed for societal change. She proposed as women moved into professional roles, others would take on child care and domestic roles. Women would no longer be unpaid wives and homemakers, instead they would achieve financial independence even when they were in stable, married relationships. Her writing urged both sexes to take responsibility for social and economic change.

Was Jimmy Carter able to get congress to help him pass his ideas into law?

The short answer to this question is no. When Jimmy Carter came to Washington, he brought with him his team from when he was a governor of Georgia, and a general dislike of the glad-handing and schmoozing that are the staples Washington politics. Due to the fact that Carter refused to "play the Washington game," and did not engage in the kind of elbow-rubbing that defines so many Washington deals, members of Congress were reluctant...

The short answer to this question is no. When Jimmy Carter came to Washington, he brought with him his team from when he was a governor of Georgia, and a general dislike of the glad-handing and schmoozing that are the staples Washington politics. Due to the fact that Carter refused to "play the Washington game," and did not engage in the kind of elbow-rubbing that defines so many Washington deals, members of Congress were reluctant to help him enact his agenda.


Yet even if members of Congress had been more personally inclined toward Carter, his ideas were not very mainstream at the time, and they faced opposition from vested interests like oil companies and banks. For instance, Carter was very prescient in warning that the United States needed to embrace solar and wind energy, as well as other emerging forms of renewable energy, in order to protect the environment and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.


Unfortunately, his disastrous handling of foreign policy (the Iranian hostage crisis and the OPEC oil embargo) overshadowed his domestic agenda, and gave him little to no political capital with which to push that agenda through congress. Carter's desire to address materialism and an economy that he felt was too dependent on consumption, went over poorly with both the general public, which was nervous about pocketbook issues, and with members of Congress, who were either against his plans or simply felt that they lacked specifics.


As for Carter's push toward renewable energy, the notion of addressing the oil shortages that were plaguing the nation by investing in long term strategies struck most Americans as "pie in the sky thinking," which would not change the immediate problems of gas rationing and stagflation. Ultimately, Carter's style and policy prescriptions were at adds with voters' sentiment, which was defined by anger, fear and a demand for quick fixes. 

What is imperialism? |

Imperialism is when a stronger nation controls a weaker nation politically and economically. Many countries were imperialistic by 1900 including the United States and Great Britain.


There were several reasons why countries were imperialistic. One reason was to help their economy. Countries that established colonies were able to get raw materials cheaper from their colonies than by purchasing them from other countries. Additionally, these countries had a guaranteed market where they could sell their products.


...

Imperialism is when a stronger nation controls a weaker nation politically and economically. Many countries were imperialistic by 1900 including the United States and Great Britain.


There were several reasons why countries were imperialistic. One reason was to help their economy. Countries that established colonies were able to get raw materials cheaper from their colonies than by purchasing them from other countries. Additionally, these countries had a guaranteed market where they could sell their products.


Another reason was to expand a country’s political and military power. Having colonies allowed a country to have bases around the world that could be used in time of war. These colonies could also serve as ports where their ships could get resupplied. By having colonies, countries had more political power and more military power.


Colonies also allowed a country to protect its trade. Without colonies, it is more difficult for a country to protect its world trade. The colonies could serve as spots where ships can operate and stay in order to protect the merchant marine if needed.


Some countries wanted colonies because they wanted to spread their way of living. They believed their way of living was better than the way of living in the colonies. They felt it was their obligation to spread their way of living to improve the lives of people living in their colonies.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

How did Odysseus know that Lampetia tattled on his men to Helios, and that Helios had gone to Zeus to get revenge?

When Odysseus and his men become stranded on the island where Helios keeps his sacred cattle, Zeus sends storms that strand them for a full month.  Although his men had been willing to leave this cows alone at first, after a month they began to question Odysseus's authority.  One day, Odysseus goes to pray, but instead of granting his prayers to help his crew leave the island, the gods put him to sleep.  Eurylochus takes...

When Odysseus and his men become stranded on the island where Helios keeps his sacred cattle, Zeus sends storms that strand them for a full month.  Although his men had been willing to leave this cows alone at first, after a month they began to question Odysseus's authority.  One day, Odysseus goes to pray, but instead of granting his prayers to help his crew leave the island, the gods put him to sleep.  Eurylochus takes this opportunity to persuade the crew to eat the cattle and come what may because it must surely be better than wasting away on this island forever.  They do it, and Lampetia tells her father, Helios, what the men have done.  Helios asks Zeus to avenge his loss, and Zeus says that he will sink their ship with a lightning bolt.  After relating this story to his auditors in Phaeacia, Odysseus says that he learned about Lampetia's and Helios's actions from Calypso (who kept him captive for several years), and she had heard it from Hermes.

One of the party slogans in George Orwell's 1984 is: "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." Can...

Winston Smith, the protagonist of George Orwell's 1984, is employed at the Ministry of Truth. The function of the ministry is to constantly rewrite all historical documents, including recent newspapers, to make them conform to party dogma and to prevent citizens from having information that might lead them to distrust Big Brother or the Party. 


One of the reasons that it is necessary to control the past is that the Party constantly makes promises...

Winston Smith, the protagonist of George Orwell's 1984, is employed at the Ministry of Truth. The function of the ministry is to constantly rewrite all historical documents, including recent newspapers, to make them conform to party dogma and to prevent citizens from having information that might lead them to distrust Big Brother or the Party. 


One of the reasons that it is necessary to control the past is that the Party constantly makes promises it cannot keep. For example, the Party promises specified amounts of rations not just of food but also of luxuries such as chocolate or tobacco. Its failure to provide these could stir the citizens to resentment. If historical records were accurate, they could look back and see that the Party is not making accurate predictions and not keeping its promises. When the party changes the past, if people look up information, they will not see the Truth but a fiction that the Party had always promised what it actually delivered. This makes people more likely to doubt their memories than to doubt the party and serves as a tool of indoctrination.


Orwell specifically intended this practice as a criticism of the Soviet Union's efforts to rewrite history books to indoctrinate its citizens. Thus the meaning of the quote is that controlling information about the past gives power in the present, which enables one to determine how things will go in the future. 

What are the main features of the modern periodic table?

Groups and Periods:

The modern periodic table is arranged in rows and columns. The rows are called periods and the columns are called groups.



  • Periods: The periods (rows) of the periodic table contain elements with the same number of electron shells. A number is usually written to the left of each period. This number is called the period number and is an indication of the number of electron shells in each period's elements.

Sections of periods six and seven are often pulled out of the main periodic table and placed at the bottom. Elements in these sections are collectively called the Inner Transition Elements. The section of elements that are pulled from period six are classified as the Lanthanide Series elements. The section of elements that are pulled from period 7 are classified as the Actinide Series elements.



  • Groups: The groups (columns) of the periodic table contain elements with similiar physical and chemical properties. The groups of the periodic table are often labeled with a Roman numeral followed by the letter "A" or the letter "B". The elements in the groups that are labeled with the letter "A", are called the Main Group elements. The elements in the groups that are labeled with the letter "B, are called the Transition Elements.

Four groups have been given special family names: Group IA elements are called the Alkali Metals. Group IIA elements are called Alkaline Earth Metals. Group VIIA elements are called the Halogens. Group VIIIA elements are called the Noble Gases.


Element Squares:


Each row and column is composed of small squares. Each square contains information about a different element. The information contained in each square includes:



  • Element Symbol: The element symbol for each element is composed of one or two letters. When the element symbol is composed of one letter, the letter is capitalized. When the element symbol is composed of two letters, the first letter is capitalized and the second letter is written in lower case. 


  • Element Name: The name of each element is usually written in each box.


  • Atomic Number: Each element has a different atomic number. The atomic number is equal to the number of protons in each element. If an atom is neutral (not charged), the atomic number is also equal to the number of electrons in each element. The elements on the periodic table are arranged by increasing atomic number.


  • Atomic Mass: The atomic mass is the average weighted mass of all of the isotopes of an element. Isotopes are different forms of an element which contain different numbers of neutrons. The term "weighted mass" indicates that the mass has been calculated using both the mass of each isotope and its percent abundance. The atomic mass can be used to approximate the sum of the protons and neutrons in a particular type of atom.

Metals, Metalloids, and Nonmetals:


The periodic table can also be used to determine if an element is a metal, metalloid, or nonmetal. Most periodic tables show a zigzag line on the right side of the periodic table. Elements that are located along the zigzag line are usually classified as metalloids. Metalloids have properties of both metals and nonmetals. The elements located to the right of the metalloids are classified as nonmetals. The elements located to the left of the metalloids (excluding hydrogen) are classified as metals. Hydrogen is classified as a nonmetal despite being located with the metals. 

When Iago warns Othello that Brabantio is "much beloved" and may try to separate him and Desdemona, what is Othello's answer, and what does it...

"Let him do his spite:My services which I have done the signioryShall out-tongue his complaints."


This is Othello's instant response to Iago's concern (which, of course, is all a lie) about his and Desdemona's marriage. Othello believes that Desdemona's father, Brabantio, can do nothing to him or to his marriage because he is convinced that his reputation as a general and all the great acts he has performed for the Venetian military will...

"Let him do his spite:
My services which I have done the signiory
Shall out-tongue his complaints."


This is Othello's instant response to Iago's concern (which, of course, is all a lie) about his and Desdemona's marriage. Othello believes that Desdemona's father, Brabantio, can do nothing to him or to his marriage because he is convinced that his reputation as a general and all the great acts he has performed for the Venetian military will outweigh any slanderous accusation that Brabantio can throw at him. 


His self-confidence turns out to be justified since the Duke of Venice concludes that there was nothing wrong in Othello's actions and that he did not, as Brabantio swore, use magic or potions to ensnare Desdemona. However, this intense belief in his own righteousness turns out to be, quite literally, Othello's fatal flaw throughout the course of this play.


Right here, at the beginning of the story, we see evidence of Othello's own powerful bias towards himself. A few lines after his assertion that his deeds as a general will have great standing with the Duke, he tells Iago that he truly loves Desdemona and says,



"I would not my unhoused free condition
Put into circumscription and confine
For the sea's worth."



He states that he would not give up his freedom for anything less than absolute love. These several lines are telling, because like every best man in every modern movie about a wedding, he seems to consider marriage to be a great burden, or at least a confining existence. This subtly sets up the idea that Othello doesn't properly appreciate Desdemona and their love. 


Othello's self-righteousness and failure to believe that others can be as great and righteous as he ends up being his downfall. Iago's deceptions only work so well because Othello has no faith in others, particularly in the loyalty of his wife. He declares boldly throughout the play that he loves Desdemona greatly, and even though she chooses him over her own father, he refuses to believe in her fidelity at the end. Ultimately, his inability to trust his wife results in him murdering her and subsequently killing himself.


Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Name three characters and discuss why they are blind to the truth in The Crucible.

In the beginning of Act Two, John Proctor is blind to the truth.  He doesn't seem to believe that Abigail would be heartless enough or is capable of murdering his wife, Elizabeth.  Even after Mary Warren tells them that Elizabeth's name was "Somewhat mentioned" in the court, Proctor says, "There'll be no noose."  Elizabeth sees immediately that "[Abigail] wants [her] dead."  However, John denies it, saying that the court dismissed the mention of Elizabeth, and...

In the beginning of Act Two, John Proctor is blind to the truth.  He doesn't seem to believe that Abigail would be heartless enough or is capable of murdering his wife, Elizabeth.  Even after Mary Warren tells them that Elizabeth's name was "Somewhat mentioned" in the court, Proctor says, "There'll be no noose."  Elizabeth sees immediately that "[Abigail] wants [her] dead."  However, John denies it, saying that the court dismissed the mention of Elizabeth, and he implores her to "sit down" and "be wise."  She senses that he has hesitated to tell the court what Abigail said to him because it would mean accusing Abigail of lying and getting her in some serious trouble; even now, she feels that he agrees to speak to Abigail "unwillingly."  It seems that John still has some feelings for Abigail, and though he is trying to quell them, they still compel him to protect her.  In Act One, he told Abigail that he "may have looked up" at her window and that he "may think of [her] softly from time to time."  Even Abigail can sense that he "loved [her] then and [he does] now."  These feelings seem to blind him to the truth of what Abigail is capable of in order to possess him.


Mr. Hale is also blind to the truth for a long while.  In Act Two, although he says, "God forbid such a one [as Rebecca Nurse] be charged," when he learns that she has been taken to the jail, he defends her arrest.  He says,



There is a misty plot afoot so subtle we should be criminal to cling to old respects and ancient friendships.  I have seen too many frightful proofs in court -- the Devil is alive in Salem, and we dare not quail to follow wherever the accusing finger points.  



He came to Salem so ready to find the Devil there that he believes anyone who confirms this belief.  By the end of the play, however, he begs Elizabeth to counsel John to lie and confess in order to save his own life.  Hale has realized that he "came into this village like a bridegroom to his beloved, bearing gifts of high religion [...]; and where [he] turned the eye of [his] great faith, blood flowed up."  Hale was arrogant due to his immense knowledge and faith, and he was thus blinded by it and unable to see the truth.


Finally, Danforth is blinded by his desire to retain authority and power.  Even in the end, when he's realizes that Parris is a "brainless man" and Abigail has run off (making her seem guilty) he will not even postpone the hangings to investigate more fully.  He says,



Postponement now speaks a floundering on my part; reprieve or pardon must cast doubt upon the guilt of them that died till now.  While I speak God's law, I will not crack its voice with whimpering.  If retaliation is your fear, know this -- I should hang ten thousand that dared to rise against the law, and an ocean of salt tears could not melt the resolution of the statutes.



Though doubt has been cast on the guilt of the convicted, Danforth is unwilling to reconsider it because he would look weak.  It would also call into question the guilt of those he's already convicted and hanged.  He is so concerned about maintaining the court's authority and power that he is blinded to the truth that the court has been corrupted from the beginning.

How did the British and the Native Americans interact?

This is quite a complex question because of the long period of time this encompasses. We are talking about a two hundred year period of interaction that spans from the first English colonies in the early 1600's until the conclusion of the war of 1812. Also, there were hundreds of sovereign Indian tribes that at various tribes had a variety of alliances. When the English first established colonies in America, the relationship with the Indians...

This is quite a complex question because of the long period of time this encompasses. We are talking about a two hundred year period of interaction that spans from the first English colonies in the early 1600's until the conclusion of the war of 1812. Also, there were hundreds of sovereign Indian tribes that at various tribes had a variety of alliances. When the English first established colonies in America, the relationship with the Indians was one of cooperation mixed with times of stress, conflict, and massacres by both sides. There was certainly a desire by both sides to benefit through trade, but ultimately, the English were visitors to America. Unfortunately, the English colonists did not feel that they were visitors and intended to stay. As it became clear that the English intended to expand at the expense of Native American territory, you can imagine how that caused increased stressed.


Throughout the early part of the Eighteenth Century, the colonists started to identify themselves as separate from the English. Land became an issue for the British, colonists, Indians, and the French. This period saw a war between France and England in which both sides formed alliances with different Indian tribes. The British allied themselves with the Iroquois and were eventually victorious over the French. The British would utilize alliances with Indians in its efforts to thwart colonial rebellion. After the American Revolution, most Native American tribes sided with the British because of the threat that the United States posed to its sovereignty and land. The interaction between Native American tribes and the British essentially ended after the War of 1812.

Is Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre a feminist novel?

Feminism advocates that social, political, and all other rights should be equal between men and women. Bronte's Jane Eyre discusses many...