Is it possible to use Postmodernism theory to analyze Shirley Jackson's the Lottery? If it possible, would you tell me the possibilities to use it?...

"The Lottery" can certainly be seen as a postmodern story because some of its features closely align with the elements of postmodern literature.

While Postmodern literature is characterized by many things, the following are seen specifically in "The Lottery."

• Jaques Derrida created the term "postmodernism" and one of his beliefs was that words cannot, 

"convey any absolute meaning, there results an impossibility of language to establish a “transcendental universal” or a universal truth"  

The...

"The Lottery" can certainly be seen as a postmodern story because some of its features closely align with the elements of postmodern literature.

While Postmodern literature is characterized by many things, the following are seen specifically in "The Lottery."

• Jaques Derrida created the term "postmodernism" and one of his beliefs was that words cannot, 

"convey any absolute meaning, there results an impossibility of language to establish a “transcendental universal” or a universal truth"  

The word "lottery" typically does have a positive connotation. This is an almost universal meaning for "lottery," yet Jackson uses the word to mean the complete opposite. Many of the words and images that Jackson uses go against the universal meanings of the word and cause us to think about them differently.

• Many have argued that one of the messages of "The Lottery" is that men have power over women, and they cite the example of Tessie Hutchinson being the one chosen (a woman) and the first one to actually rebel against the ritual, but no one cares and they kill her anyway, thus she is powerless as a result of a male-driven community. This example could also be seen as a binary relationship that sets up a "violent hierarchy ," in which Derrida would say one individual/group/word/concept has power over another.


• Derrida also believed in the idea that there is nothing other than the text. In other words, the text is all you need to determine meaning. You do not need to look outside of the text in order to make it meaningful, and one could easily argue that this story is timeless because it is full of meaning regardless of when or why it was written. The plot and characters craft a warning about blindly following any individual, group, or ideology and understanding that message is not reliant on knowing anything about the timeframe in which it was written.